.

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Program evaluations and evidence-based process Assignment

Program evaluations and evidence-based process - Assignment Example Secondly, the audiences for evaluating such as bankers, customers, management, board, staff or clients and lastly but not the least, the kind of information required in order to decide on the need of enlightening the intended audiences. For example, the information about program’s activities, inputs and outputs, the clients or customers who experience the program, weaknesses or strengths of the program, the outcomes towards the clients or customers and why and how the program failed (Langbein, 2012). Other questions require the sources where to collect the information either from customers, clients or program documentation. Secondly, the fashion on which the information is supposed to be collected, for example through interviewing, conducting questionnaires, observing customers or examining documentation. Thirdly, the time the information is needed and lastly the resources available for the collection of the information (Mertens & Wilson, 2012). Meanwhile, the evidence-based process is systematically and consistently selected, identified and evaluated. It involves the seven steps as analyzed. Step one is the identification of the evidence Systematic Literature Surveillance is conducted using many review services of journals, journals, guideline’s collections and systematic review collections. DynaMed Content Sources is an example of a comprehensive list of sources. Step two involves selection of the best available evidence (Rubin, 2013). All articles are evaluated for clinical relevance, and the relevant articles are further evaluated for validity in relation to the existing DynaMed content. A summary of the most valid articles is made, integrated with the DynaMed content and the outline structure and overview statements are updated basing on the overall evidence synthesis. Selection of an article is done completed by the editors with clinical training and expertise in scientific analysis (Rousseau, 2012). Step three

No comments:

Post a Comment